Montserrat’s governor
issues new statement on
ongoing volcanic
situation

H.E Governor Deborah
Barnes Jones
Brades, Montserrat,
GIU, March 9, 2007:This
statement follows on
from that made by the
Governor on 6 March,
when she said that the
Scientific Advisory
Committee (SAC) had
produced a report about
the risks to the
community from the
Soufriere Hills volcano.
The Governor was
grateful for the
opportunity to meet with
the Emergency Policy
Group (EPG) on 5 March,
and the Volcano
Executive Group (VEG) on
8 March to hear their
views on the latest
developments.
The MVO have been
updating the community
on a daily basis. There
are no surprises in the
analysis of the
situation at the volcano
in the SAC report. Risk
to the area north of
Nantes river remains at
background levels. The
north remains safe for
community life.
What is new is the use
the SAC have made of the
available information.
The report takes the
most recent data on dome
volumes and concentrates
on an area of high risk
but low probability.
That is the matter of
lateral blasts. A
lateral blast is
powerful explosions with
a significant directed
horizontal component
which can generate high
energy pyroclastic flows
and surges. The civil
authorities, working
through the EPG and the
VEG have been coming to
terms with the
implications of the SAC
modelling in this area.
The SAC have used
cutting edge technology
to give information on
what might be expected
to happen in the
unlikely event of a
lateral blast directed
towards the north-west.
This is an unlikely
scenario, but cannot be
ruled out. It will
become more likely if
dome growth returns to
the north-west side of
the volcano; not the
case at present. The
results of a lateral
blast, should one take
place, could be expected
to be extremely harmful.
During discussion, the
civil authorities looked
at the following
information included in
the latest scientific
advice:
• The threat posed to
the NW sector by the
volume of material which
could flow down Tyres
Ghaut and reach the
lower Belham Valley and
surrounding areas has
not diminished.
• The range for the
amount of material
available above Tyres
Ghaut is large,
depending on what method
of calculation is used,
between 13 and 23 m
cubic metres.
• The likely scenario
for March is that the
dome will continue
building, with no
collapse.
• The present unsafe
area represents the
minimum boundary to
protect the community
from the present risk,
which comes primarily
from a gravitational
collapse.
• The chance of a
lateral blast is
“unlikely but possible”.
On the basis of the
detailed information
provided by the SAC, the
conclusions discussed in
VEG were that:
• The present boundaries
of the unsafe area
should remain in place.
• Daytime access to the
unsafe area may continue
for the time being,
while the results for
the trial prolongation
of the daytime hours are
considered by the RMPF.
But there is risk to
those entering the area,
and they need to be
briefed on the
information now
received.
• A public information
effort should begin
immediately to brief the
wider community on the
information now
available.
• If the likelihood of
lateral blast increases,
or the amount of
material above Tyres
Ghaut makes a flow of
over 20million cu metres
of material into the
Lower Belham a
possibility, the
authorities would need
to take further
measures, including
relocation, to protect
the population.
• Work should go forward
now to understand better
the likelihood of a
lateral blast, what
might cause it to
increase, and how to
advise the population to
deal with this.